The discussions of the book mostly are journalistic in nature and are notes, interviews and speeches that pertain to a specific time and place. In other words, they have a defined expiration date. From this point of view, the book is like a collection of newspaper articles and therefore is not pedagogical in nature. For a scholar of political economy, the book lacks sufficient credibility and in practice and doesn’t add to his/her capacity for academic analysis. However, for the intellectual gestures of the cafeteria in the critique of capitalism, it can provide the content of influential and revolutionary statements; Without providing a clear and achievable solution.